Header image

The Truth About the Lordship of Christ by John MacArthur

Admittedly, I was drawn to this book because of the author.  I recognized his name as a noted modern conservative theologian – but I had never actually read anything by him.

It was a pleasant surprise.

Although I didn’t agree with everything MacArthur discussed in the bindings of his book, there were many areas that I did enjoy.  MacArthur delivered a hard hitting message regarding love and hate in the Bible.  He also openly calls out those who are two faced, suggesting that “all those who are outwardly identified as the people of God are not inwardly the people of God” (16).

Along the same idea, he says: “Being a genuine Christian means to exhibit the character of Christ and, thus, to be treated as He was treated” (17).  In fact, he goes on to say that “suffering is God’s way of maturing His people spiritually” (49).

This was all very agreeable.

MacArthur, of course, takes a Calvinist approach talking about eternal destination, beginning to talk about “God’s hatred for the wicked” (8).  This, and the subsequent study of the right of the human to hate other humans, was where I didn’t exactly see eye to eye with Mr. MacArthur.

(more…)

I am Second, by Dave Sterrett and Doug Bender, forward by Colt McCoy

 

The idea behind the book is to put God first in your life, and to be “second.”  It is a very interesting premise, and is a very helpful tool for devotional material for any youth group setting.  However, with that said, I found the videos to be a better presentation than the book.  Although the book had some valuable things to say, and said them in greater detail, the videos tended to be a quicker way to get the same message across in a much more effective medium.

 

With that said, the book remains a solid tool for reaching young people, and for small group settings.  I liked the book, but I found the videos equally good, if not better.

America: The Last Best Hope Vol III written by William Bennett.  I’ve got to admit, I am a sucker for these types of commentaries.  I love reading about American Politics, especially modern politics.  I was expecting a strict party bias, and found myself to be little bit surprised.

This book opens with what seems to be an attempt to rehabilitate President George H. W. Bush’s image.  Although I do not doubt the deep relationship that these two had, I don’t think that it was entirely necessary or relevant to note.  Regardless, the book then launches into an interesting piece on the ’88 primaries.

In this section, I found myself to be quite impressed with the author’s response to the statement: “The Christians have won.”  Bennett replied by saying that this “was the wrong way to campaign and think: campaigns should not be based on religious balkanization or sectarianism like that” (4).  After reading this, I discovered a new respect for the author.  One thing that really bothered me in the first chapter, however, was the author’s praise of Bush’s attempt towards bipartisanship (19), while later outlining that he ‘pledged’ to not have any new taxes (37).  Nothing says bipartisanship quite like pledging to not do what the other guys want.  I do, however, find the book to bring a lot of clarity to Bush’s unpopularity with the right.  It explains the many reasons why moderates lost faith in him, and voted for Clinton in the subsequent election.

The book continues through the Clinton presidency, into the 2000 election, W. Bush’s election, and finally, the rise of Barack Obama.  As I said, I was expecting a man who was unshakably Republican-accepting no substitutes, however, I was impressed with his handling of Barack Obama.  Many of the other books I have read about Obama (written by members of the GOP) have held him in poor regard.  Bennett seems to merely present the facts (albeit with a few obvious biases).

This book was one of the better books I’ve reviewed, and would be helpful to those who are looking for a general overview of this historic period.

No He Can’t written by Kevin McCullough

Personally, I find many sentiments in this book to be offensive.

First of all, the title, which is meant to be a catchy and funny take on President Obama’s election slogan, was to me, just really cheesy and not very tactful.  Immediately we know the direction of the book, because former Republican governor and Fox News contributor, Mike Huckabee, wrote the foreword.

After Huckabee’s foreword, the book launches into the introduction, which condescendingly claims that a Democrat can’t be a Christian (xxi), and states that Sarah Palin is “clear-thinking and clear-speaking” (xxiii).  Were we looking at the same candidate?

For every point made in this book, there is a counterpoint that is considered to be equally valid by half of the population.  That is the nature of politics, and the wonder of democracy; we are all allowed to voice our very own, self-administered, opinions.  Unfortunately, there are many ways to do so that are not necessarily rooted in the cleanest manor.  This book is guilty of the foremost of these: it presents an issue without showing all sides, and even takes things out of context.

(more…)

Book cover

Peace Be With You: Monastic Wisdom for a Terror-Filled World written by David Carlson.

I wasn’t sure what to expect when I picked up this book.  At the time that I had ordered it, there were no reviews written about it (and the reviews that did come in shortly thereafter seemed quite grim).  A lot of people who wrote reviews seemed offended by the author’s attempt to tap many different sources.  However, I found this quite helpful in understanding the effects of 9/11 seen around the world.

The book, which focuses around many interviews with monks, clergy and other religious figures, addresses the reactions that these people had to the events that happened in September ten years ago.  Using a style that is not so often found in academic writing (first person), the author explores the lives of the people that the world does not often pay attention to: monks in remote locations.

At one point, the author asks a troubling line of questioning made to make the reader think.  He said: “Was 9/11 something like what the Japanese experienced in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?” (43) And indeed, it is troubling, but not because it is incorrect, but because it is something that people in North America don’t really think about.  It seems that 9/11 created an atmosphere of loathing and self-pity that “only seemed to isolate [the United States] further from the rest of the world (43).”

However, as the first section progressed, the author began to touch on a more radical teaching that could be perceived as controversial: love your enemy.  Being a Christian who completely loves the words written in red in my Bible (words Jesus spoke), I found this to be the greatest contribution to the 9/11 debates.  In the author’s own personal revelation he said: “I felt that I could be an American after 9/11 and ignore Jesus’ radical forgiveness, but I could not do that and still be a Christian (91).”  A challenging and interesting thought: ‘forgive the terrorists.’

(more…)

Be the People: A Call to Reclaim America’s Faith and Promise, written by Carol M. Swain.

Admittedly, I was quite skeptical of this book from the get-go, but being interested in politics and religion, it seemed like a logical choice. The very first thing I noticed as I opened the book was a review from a Fox News host, Sean Hannity, and immediately I knew who the intended reader was – the über right wing.

As I read on, I was not surprised to find traits straight from the GOP’s platform. Heavily drenched in chest thumping regarding taxes and governmental spending programs led me to believe that this could be confused with some form of Tea Party Manifesto.

Within the first few pages of this book, I stumbled across a passage that was remarkably troubling. The author is so fixated on abortion and homosexuality that she seems to miss the section of the Bible that includes helping the poor and looking after our planet – topics that are not even discussed in the bindings of this book. You cannot argue something is Christian if you leave out some of the most basic teachings of the most principal character. The quote in question discusses the population of Christians who are “disillusioned with the ethical and moral shifts in our political and social institutions” (3); it is interesting that she believes it is all right to restrict social programs to the poor and protect the wealthiest Americans, as long as “moral shifts” are battled. I think she is right in saying that morals are shifting in the wrong direction, but to fix that, she must also assess her own judgment.

(more…)

...

It is hard to believe that the same Republican party that ended slavery has shifted so far from its roots.  Those members of the Tea Party would argue that it has merely gone back to the country’s roots.  But considering the fact that the Founding Fathers had such antithetical beliefs to the modern Tea Party, I don’t see the connection anymore.

However, that is not what I wanted to talk about.  I wanted to talk about the shifts of belief in recent past.

The restriction of bargaining rights in Wisconsin recently, among other issues, caused me to take a look back in time to see where other famous Republicans thought, and what they would have said to modern members of the GOP about current issues.  The result wasn’t exactly pretty.

Firstly, why not begin with a bang.  Recently, Wisconsin Governor, Scott Walker signed a bill into law that would completely remove the right of collective bargaining, effectively destroying unions.  Many people on the right side of the perspective would think that this is a good idea, but to show just how much they have lost their way, lets take a look at what someone who had an impact on the Republican party.  Politicians have drifted so far right that they defy their so-called conservative godfather, Ronald Reagan when he, in 1980, said, “Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost.”

(more…)

...

It really isn’t a complicated idea to grasp. In the wake of the shooting in Arizona, there has been increased rhetoric about the legality of guns. As expected, the conservatives in the crowd have come out swinging against gun-control measures.

In fact, they have done so in a much more extreme way.

In South Dakota, a bill was introduced that would force every adult to purchase a firearm. Across the country, people have been talking about the ability to carry weapons in public places, including university campuses. And in Arizona, the place where Gabby Giffords was shot in the head, where many were wounded and several were killed, the governor abolished the need to have a permit for carrying a concealed weapon.

(more…)

This KAIROS issue begs some excuse:
A Ministerial Statement from Dr. Seuss

(more…)

Faux News at work

The usual argument against Fox (faux) News is that they are too biased.  Although that is true, it is not the reason that they should be slapped on the wrist.  The reason why Faux News is a terrible news source is because of their tactics – in order to attempt to convince the masses of their dialect, they take unrelated stories, choose a sound bite, twist it, and then present it as relevant information.  For those people who do not have the commonsense to question what they see on the television, this can be very dangerous.

It’s true though, they are extremely biased, but when someone makes that argument, I don’t think they realize and take into account their own news sources.  These days, it is impossible to find a completely unbiased news station, or Internet site.  For example, Huffington Post, MSNBC, and even CNN are biased – but they do it with tact.  They at least attempt to be unbiased and try to show all sides of the story.  Well, maybe not MSNBC…  But hell, even this website is bias.

(more…)